Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1608

reference
457-tree-1
name
1608
tree-preservation-order

undefined

457-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.044464 50.883362)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.044280 50.883342,-1.044288 50.883379,-1.044314 50.883411,-1.044354 50.883438,-1.044405 50.883455,-1.044462 50.883461,-1.044519 50.883456,-1.044571 50.883439,-1.044613 50.883414,-1.044639 50.883382,-1.044649 50.883346,-1.044641 50.883309,-1.044615 50.883277,-1.044575 50.883250,-1.044524 50.883233,-1.044467 50.883227,-1.044410 50.883232,-1.044358 50.883249,-1.044316 50.883274,-1.044289 50.883306,-1.044280 50.883342)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL